Contact Us
1000 characters left

Accessing means of escape

Assessing means of escape

The aim of the following paragraphs is to provide enough information for you to make a reasonable assessment of the escape routes from your workplace to decide whether they are adequate and can be safely used in the event of fire. Because of the wide variation in the type of workplaces covered by the Fire Regulations, it is only possible to give a general guide to the level of precautions required to satisfy those Regulations in most workplaces. So this guide does not seek to give specific advice about each individual type of workplace. If your workplace is unusual, particularly if it is a large, complex premises or involved with specialised activities or risks, you may wish to seek specialist advice or refer to further specific guidance.

In some cases, it may be necessary to provide additional means of escape or to improve the fire protection of existing escape routes. If, having carried out your risk assessment, you think this might be the case in your workplace, consult the fire authority and, where necessary, your local building control officer before carrying out any alterations. It would be a time-consuming and complicated process, requiring specialist expertise, to establish the time needed in each individual case. So this guide uses an established method for assessing means of escape which has been found to be generally acceptable in all but the most particular circumstances. This method is based upon limiting travel distances according to the category of potential fire risk the workplace falls into.

These distances ensure that people will be able to escape within the appropriate period of time. You can use actual calculated escape times but should do so only after consulting a fire safety specialist with appropriate training and expertise in this field.
Fire risk categories for assessing the means of escape

In general, most workplaces can be categorised as high, normal or low risk. Examples of the type of workplace or areas within workplaces likely to fall within these categories are:High

Where highly flammable or explosive materials are stored or used (other than in small quantities).

Where unsatisfactory structural features are present such as:

lack of fire-resisting separation;

vertical or horizontal openings through which fire, heat and smoke can spread;

long and complex escape routes created by extensive subdivision of large floor areas by partitions, or the distribution of display units in shops or machinery in factories; and

large areas of flammable or smoke-producing surfaces on either walls or ceilings.

Where permanent or temporary work activities are carried out which have the potential for fires to start and spread such as:

workshops in which highly flammable materials are used, e.g. paint spraying;

areas where the processes involve the use of naked flame, or produce excessive heat;

large kitchens in works canteens and restaurants;

refuse chambers and waste disposal areas; and

areas where foamed plastics or upholstered furniture are stored.

Where there is a significant risk to life in case of fire, such as where:
sleeping accommodation is provided for staff, the public or other visitors in significant numbers;

treatment or care is provided where the occupants have to rely upon the actions of limited numbers of staff for their safe evacuation;
there is a high proportion of elderly or infirm people, or people with temporary or permanent physical or mental disabilities, who need assistance to escape;

groups of people are working in isolated parts of the premises such as basements, roof spaces, cable ducts and service tunnels etc; and
large numbers of people are present relative to the size of the premises (e.g. sales at department stores) or in other circumstances where only a low level of assistance may be available in an emergency (e.g. places of entertainment and sports events).

Normal

Where any outbreak of fire is likely to remain confined or only spread slowly, allowing people to escape to a place of safety.
Where the number of people present is small and the layout of the workplace means they are likely to be able to escape to a place of safety without assistance.
Where the workplace has an effective automatic warning system, or an effective automatic fire-extinguishing, -suppression or -containment system, which may reduce the risk classification from high risk.

Low

Where there is minimal risk to people's lives and where the risk of fire occurring is low, or the potential for fire, heat and smoke spreading is negligible.
The work you have done on assessing the risks and reducing the risk of fire occurring, together with the knowledge you have gained about the location of people at risk, should generally provide you with the information you need to establish the risk category or categories of your workplace.

General principles for escape routes

Other than in small workplaces, or from some rooms of low or normal fire risk, there should normally be alternative means of escape from all parts of the workplace. Routes which provide means of escape in one direction only (from a dead-end) should be avoided wherever possible as this could mean that people have to move towards a fire in order to escape. Each escape route should be independent of any other and arranged so that people can move away from a fire in order to escape. Escape routes should always lead to a place of safety. They should also be wide enough for the number of occupants and should not normally reduce in width. Escape routes and exits should be available for use and kept clear of obstruction at all times.

Evacuation times and length of escape routes

The aim is, from the time the fire alarm is raised, for everyone to be able to reach a place of relative safety, i.e. a storey exit (see 'Technical terms relating to means of escape'), within the time available for escape.The time for people to reach a place of relative safety should include the time it takes them to react to a fire warning.

This will depend on a number of factors including:
what they are likely to be doing when the alarm is raised, e.g. sleeping, having a meal etc;

what they may have had to do before starting to escape, e.g. turn off machinery, help other people etc; and
their knowledge of the building and the training they have received about the routine to be followed in the event of fire.

Where necessary, you can check these by carrying out a practice drill.

To ensure that the time available for escape is reasonable, the length of the escape route from any occupied part of the workplace to the storey exit should not exceed:

Where more than one route is provided

25 metres - high-fire-risk area;
32 metres - normal-fire-risk (sleeping) area;
45 metres - normal-fire-risk area;
60 metres - low-fire-risk area.

Where only a single escape route is provided

12 metres - high-fire-risk area;
16 metres - normal-fire-risk (sleeping) area;
18 metres - normal-fire-risk area (except production areas in factories);
25 metres - normal-fire-risk area (including production areas within factories);
45 metres -low-fire-risk area.

Where the route leading to a storey exit starts in a corridor with a dead-end, then continues via a route which has an alternative, the total distance should not exceed that given above for 'Where more than one route is provided'. However, the distances within the 'dead-end portion' should not exceed those given for 'Where only a single escape route is provided'.

People with disabilities

You may need to make special arrangements for staff with disabilities, which should be developed in consultation with the staff themselves. British Standard 5588: Part 8 gives guidance and provides full information.

Premises providing residential care and/or treatment

The distances shown in the paragraphs above may not be suitable for workplaces providing residential care. You should refer to the relevant guidance listed in the References section or seek specialist advice.

Number and width of exits

There should be enough available exits, of adequate width, from every room, storey or building. The adequacy of the escape routes and doors can be assessed on the basis that:
a doorway of no less than 750 millimetres in width is suitable for up to 40 people per minute (where doors are likely to be used by wheelchair users the doorway should be at least 800 millimetres wide); and

a doorway of no less than 1 metre in width is suitable for up to 80 people per minute.
Where more than 80 people per minute are expected to use a door, the minimum doorway width should be increased by 75 millimetres for each additional group of 15 people.

For the purposes of calculating whether the existing exit doorways are suitable for the numbers using them, you should assume that the largest exit door from any part of the workplace may be unavailable for use. This means that the remaining doorways should be capable of providing a satisfactory means of escape for everyone present.